هذه نسخة قديمة منشورة في 2025-02-28. إقرأ النسخة الأحدث.

مقالة

Measuring continuity after paediatric to adult sickle cell care transfer in Saudi Arabia: a critical narrative review

المؤلفون

  • lumora fatema
    • College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdullah Bany Hamdan
    • Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmad Fawzi Arbaeen
    • Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmed Abd El Warith
    • King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ali Hani Alnajim
    • King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

المجلة متعددة التخصصات للرعاية الصحية مجلد 1 عدد 2 (2025) نُشر في

وصول مفتوح CC BY 4.0
لغة النص: العربية
تنزيل PDF · العربية عرض الأصل
ملفات إضافية
عرض النص الكامل
اقتباس

اقتبس هذه المقالة

fatema, lumora, Bany Hamdan, A., Arbaeen, A. F., Abd El Warith, A., & Alnajim, A. H. (2025). Measuring continuity after paediatric to adult sickle cell care transfer in Saudi Arabia: a critical narrative review. المجلة متعددة التخصصات للرعاية الصحية, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.68608/d30d5c22
مشاركة

الملخص

Background: A first adult appointment is only one part of continued care for young people with sickle cell disease (SCD). Saudi adult-service publications provide context but do not measure the paediatric-to-adult transfer interval.

Objective: To examine transition measures and propose a bounded Saudi evaluation that separates transfer, sustained engagement and patient-important outcomes. Sources and approach: We conducted purposive PubMed and SciSpace-assisted searches in a targeted literature search and checked cited identities and five accessible pivotal full texts. This is a critical narrative review, not a systematic review or Saudi guideline. Synthesis: US consensus standards combine adult visits with identification of an adult SCD medical home, but have not been validated as Saudi thresholds. In a US cohort restricted to people reaching partner adult centres, a transfer gap of at least six months was associated with more inpatient and emergency use; selection and case mix limit causal inference. Three readiness-score cohorts did not consistently predict transfer or utilization. A US randomized trial found a statistically supported but modest quality-of-life score contrast from community health worker support, below its prespecified large-effect threshold.

Conclusion: A Saudi evaluation should enumerate eligible young people, link paediatric and adult encounters, retain missing and out-of-network care, and pair time-to-contact with sustained visits, patient experience, safety and clinical outcomes. Indicators require local co-design, feasibility and validity testing before they become performance targets.

إقرارات

الموافقة الأخلاقية
NA
الموافقة على المشاركة
NA
الموافقة على النشر
NA
التمويل
NA
تضارب المصالح
NA
مساهمات المؤلفين
NA
توافر البيانات
NA
التسجيل
NA
الشكر والتقدير
NA

التعليقات

التعليق يتطلب حساباً وتسجيل الدخول.