Article

Prior spontaneous and induced pregnancy loss and secondary infertility: type-specific associations in a matched case-control study

Authors

  • Markandu Thirukumar
    • Faculty of Health Care Sciences, Honorary Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist & Senior Lecturer, Eastern University, Batticaloa, Sri Lanka
  • Aakanksha Dogra
    • Government Medical College and Hospital Amritsar, Amritsar, India
  • Aamir Mahmood
    • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
  • Abdelrahman Yousif
    • Hurley Medical Center, Flint, United States
  • Abdul Rahman Rahana
    • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025) Published

Open access CC BY 4.0
Article language: العربية
Download PDF · العربية View original
View full text
Cite

Cite this article

Thirukumar, M., Dogra, A., Mahmood, A., Yousif, A., & Rahana, A. R. (2026). Prior spontaneous and induced pregnancy loss and secondary infertility: type-specific associations in a matched case-control study. Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.68608/23z4gk71 (Original work published 2026)
Share

Abstract

Background: Reports of secondary infertility present induced terminations and spontaneous losses side by side without testing whether they are associated with the outcome to the same degree. We asked whether the association is specific to the type of loss.

Methods: We reanalysed a matched case-control study of secondary infertility, each case matched individually to controls on age, parity and education. Conditional logistic regression entered both exposures as ordered scores; a likelihood-ratio test compared it with the model constraining their coefficients to be equal. Reporting error and unmeasured confounding were quantified by reclassification and E-values.

Results: 83 cases and 165 controls formed 83 matched sets, of which 59 and 62 carried information. Mutually adjusted odds ratios per category increase were 4.09 (95% CI 2.11–8.80) for induced terminations and 7.29 (95% CI 3.87–15.60) for spontaneous losses, and were not equal (p = 0.022). Fitted alone, terminations showed no association (1.08 (95% CI 0.71–1.62)). With random as well as systematic error included, the bias-corrected interval for any induced termination included 1 once controls were assumed to report terminations less completely than cases; with complete reporting among cases, from a completeness of 0.88 among controls (a reporting differential of 0.12).

Conclusions: Spontaneous loss was associated with secondary infertility with and without adjustment, whereas the association with induced termination appeared only with spontaneous losses held constant at fixed parity and was sensitive to modest differential reporting; the two are not interchangeable summaries of pregnancy-loss history.

Declarations

Ethics approval
NA
Consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Funding
NA
Competing interests
NA
Author contributions
NA
Data availability
NA
Registration
NA
Acknowledgements
NA

Comments

Commenting requires an account and sign-in.