Article

Measuring continuity after paediatric to adult sickle cell care transfer in Saudi Arabia: a critical narrative review

Authors

  • Fatema Alawad
    • College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Abdullah Bany Hamdan
    • Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmad Fawzi Arbaeen
    • Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
  • Ahmed Abd El Warith
    • King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ali Hani Alnajim
    • King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025) Published

Open access CC BY 4.0
Article language: العربية
Download PDF · العربية View original
View full text
Cite

Cite this article

Alawad, F., Bany Hamdan, A., Arbaeen, A. F., Abd El Warith, A., & Alnajim, A. H. (2025). Measuring continuity after paediatric to adult sickle cell care transfer in Saudi Arabia: a critical narrative review. Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.68608/d30d5c22
Share

Abstract

Background: A first adult appointment is only one part of continued care for young people with sickle cell disease (SCD). Saudi adult-service publications provide context but do not measure the paediatric-to-adult transfer interval.

Objective: To examine transition measures and propose a bounded Saudi evaluation that separates transfer, sustained engagement and patient-important outcomes. Sources and approach: We conducted purposive PubMed and SciSpace-assisted searches in a targeted literature search and checked cited identities and five accessible pivotal full texts. This is a critical narrative review, not a systematic review or Saudi guideline. Synthesis: US consensus standards combine adult visits with identification of an adult SCD medical home, but have not been validated as Saudi thresholds. In a US cohort restricted to people reaching partner adult centres, a transfer gap of at least six months was associated with more inpatient and emergency use; selection and case mix limit causal inference. Three readiness-score cohorts did not consistently predict transfer or utilization. A US randomized trial found a statistically supported but modest quality-of-life score contrast from community health worker support, below its prespecified large-effect threshold.

Conclusion: A Saudi evaluation should enumerate eligible young people, link paediatric and adult encounters, retain missing and out-of-network care, and pair time-to-contact with sustained visits, patient experience, safety and clinical outcomes. Indicators require local co-design, feasibility and validity testing before they become performance targets.

Declarations

Ethics approval
NA
Consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Funding
NA
Competing interests
NA
Author contributions
NA
Data availability
NA
Registration
NA
Acknowledgements
NA

Comments

Commenting requires an account and sign-in.