Article

Trauma-informed approaches in adult healthcare encounters: a focused narrative review of ethical practice, clinical evidence, and implementation safeguards

Authors

  • Abdulrahman Shudayyid Lafi Al Mutairi
  • Ahmed Khaled Alkhateeb
  • Ahmed Saeed Almalki
  • Alaa Yahia Alhilaly

Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal Vol. 1 No. 8 (2025) Published

Open access CC BY 4.0
Article language: العربية
Download PDF · العربية View original
View full text
Cite

Cite this article

Al Mutairi, A. S. L., Alkhateeb, A. K., Almalki, A. S., & Alhilaly, A. Y. (2025). Trauma-informed approaches in adult healthcare encounters: a focused narrative review of ethical practice, clinical evidence, and implementation safeguards. Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.68608/5wd5ts49
Share

Abstract

Background. Trauma-informed care (TIC) describes relational and organizational approaches that differ from trauma-focused treatment.

Objective. To examine adult encounter safeguards, patient-outcome evidence and implementation limits.

Methods. Focused PubMed Title/Abstract keyword discovery on 6 October 2026 was capped at 45 records, with targeted supplementary verified sources. Selection and English-language reading were purposive. Six lawful PMC copies were retained and accessible passages consulted; other records were assessed at indexed abstract/metadata level. No exhaustive search, duplicate human screening, registered protocol, new meta-analysis or formal certainty grading was undertaken.

Synthesis. The 2025 AHRQ review included 12 studies in 16 publications, all at high risk of bias, and found insufficient evidence for patient/client outcomes; its studies did not collect harms [1]. Its July 2024 cutoff precedes the Chilean cluster trial enrolling 214 patients across 16 teams, which reported lower six-month depression scores for a defined bundled model; 81/115 and 60/99 participants were evaluated at six months [2]. A New Orleans pilot enrolled 42, analyzed 40 at baseline and retained 36 at nine months; between-group PTSD comparisons were non-significant [3]. Training findings concern provider or standardized-encounter outcomes and cannot establish routine patient benefit [4]. The AHRQ evidence spans adult, pediatric and social-service settings, including only two adult medical studies and one adult mental-health study. This mixed scope limits the directness of its conclusion for adult encounters.

Conclusion. Choice, privacy and response capacity provide an ethical implementation rationale. Patient-effectiveness claims require model-, population- and outcome-specific evidence; no local effect or universal screening superiority is established.

Declarations

Ethics approval
NA
Consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Funding
NA
Competing interests
NA
Author contributions
NA
Data availability
NA
Registration
NA
Acknowledgements
NA

Comments

Commenting requires an account and sign-in.