This is an outdated version published on 2025-05-31. Read the most recent version.

Article

Stigma-Related Survey Responses and Anticipated Help-Seeking Deterrence in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: An Area-Standardized Secondary Analysis and Measurement Appraisal

Authors

  • Fatema Alawad
    • College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Christopher Amalraj Vallaba Doss
    • Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia
  • Duha Kalthoum
    • King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Ghazi Al Obaid Sr.
    • AlAhsa Health Directorate, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Hanaa Bayomy
    • Northern Border University Faculty of Medicine, Arar, Saudi Arabia

Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal Vol. 1 No. 5 (2025) Published

Open access CC BY 4.0
Article language: العربية
Download PDF · العربية View original
View full text
Cite

Cite this article

Alawad, F., Doss, C. A. V., Kalthoum, D., Al Obaid Sr., G., & Bayomy, H. (2025). Stigma-Related Survey Responses and Anticipated Help-Seeking Deterrence in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: An Area-Standardized Secondary Analysis and Measurement Appraisal. Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.68608/xpys7f27
Share

Abstract

Background: Stigma may affect mental health help-seeking, but a common survey outcome and an unvalidated composite can be difficult to interpret. We examined openly deposited Al-Ahsa survey data using area-standardized estimates, prevalence ratios and an appraisal of the stigma and deterrence measures.

Methods: We reanalysed 1,085 adult respondents to an October–November 2024 community survey in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. We constructed area-calibration weights using the three administrative-area population shares reported by the source investigators. We estimated composite-defined outcome proportions and covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs), examined item-level associations, and conducted exploratory latent class and psychometric analyses. Confidence intervals assume independent observations within the reported areas because original cluster identifiers were unavailable.

Results: Under the original questionnaire cut-offs, the area-standardized proportion meeting the deterrence criterion was 59.7% (model-based 95% CI 56.5–62.9), and the proportion meeting the stigma criterion was 22.6% (20.0–25.4). Overall, 70.9% endorsed the statement that community stigma prevents help-seeking. The adjusted association between the two composite indicators was PR 1.21 (1.08–1.36), versus an adjusted odds ratio of 1.72. The five stigma items had poor internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.28); the four deterrence items had alpha 0.60. Witnessing harsh treatment was associated with the composite deterrence indicator (exploratory adjusted PR 1.37 [1.20–1.55]). A three-class model was selected exploratorily (classification entropy 0.57).

Conclusions: Approximately six in ten survey respondents met the original composite definition of stigma-related help-seeking deterrence; this is not a measured rate of actual care avoidance or a proven population prevalence. The adjusted stigma–deterrence association was modest, and the heterogeneous stigma items should not be interpreted as a validated single construct. Future studies should validate their scales, record recruitment and clustering information, and distinguish anticipated barriers from actual service use.

Declarations

Ethics approval
NA
Consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Funding
NA
Competing interests
NA
Author contributions
NA
Data availability
NA
Registration
NA
Acknowledgements
NA

Comments

Commenting requires an account and sign-in.