Article

Topology of published referral counts among Saudi health clusters: an orientation-invariant audit of the 2024 Ministry of Health matrix

Authors

  • Fatema Alawad
    • College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
  • Amen Bawazir
    • Al Maarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu
    • Jouf University, Sakaka, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia
  • Bander Alsayed
    • Ministry of Health, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Bashaer Aloufi
    • Ministry of Health, Taif, Saudi Arabia

Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025) Published

Open access CC BY 4.0
Article language: العربية
Download PDF · العربية View original
View full text
Cite

Cite this article

Alawad, F., Bawazir, A., Thirunavukkarasu, A., Alsayed, B., & Aloufi, B. (2025). Topology of published referral counts among Saudi health clusters: an orientation-invariant audit of the 2024 Ministry of Health matrix. Multidisciplinary Healthcare Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.68608/jverft17
Share

Abstract

Background: The Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) publishes a cluster-by-cluster table of referrals including reverse referrals. Its two axis headings do not safely establish the direction of a particular cell, and the table does not define whether entries are unique people, requests or completed care. We described its topology using calculations unchanged by transposing the matrix.

Methods: We audited the official 2024 yearbook Table 4-63 as a complete 20 × 20 array. We verified all 400 cells and 40 marginal totals. We calculated diagonal and off-diagonal shares, then combined the two opposing positions for each of 190 unordered pairs of distinct cluster labels. The five largest pairs were an exploratory display cutoff; we also checked ranks one, six and ten and separately identified four pairs whose printed labels share a Riyadh or Jeddah city name. No patient, facility or population denominator was available.

Results: The 400 cells totalled 341,365 published counts. Diagonal cells contributed 301,968 (88.46%); off-diagonal cells contributed 39,397 (11.54%). The five largest unordered pairs contributed 17,496 (44.41% of the off-diagonal total). Fifth-ranked Madinah–Tabouk (1,724) exceeded sixth-ranked Eastern–Al-Ahsa (1,704) by 20; the top six contributed 48.73%. Four pairs between distinct clusters sharing a Riyadh or Jeddah city name contributed 15,772 (40.03% of off-diagonal counts); other off-diagonal counts totalled 23,625 (6.92% of N). These are positional descriptions, not travel or referral-fulfilment measures.

Conclusions: The MOH table permits a reproducible account of concentration among printed cluster labels, especially unordered pairs. It cannot show unique-patient movements, accepted or completed referrals, access, quality or clinical outcomes. Source-owner definitions and orientation are needed before directional or performance analysis.

Declarations

Ethics approval
NA
Consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Funding
NA
Competing interests
NA
Author contributions
NA
Data availability
NA
Registration
NA
Acknowledgements
NA

Comments

Commenting requires an account and sign-in.